Author Guidelines
Manuscript Originality
-
Manuscripts submitted to Jurnal Pertanian Terpadu must be original works and have not been published previously.
-
Manuscripts must not be under review or consideration by any other publisher, unless specific prior notifications have been formally delivered to the editors.
-
Manuscripts currently undergoing the editorial and publication process must not be submitted elsewhere.
-
Jurnal Pertanian Terpadu utilizes a Similarity Check application with a maximum similarity threshold of 20% to prevent plagiarism.
-
Authors must include all contributors who participated meaningfully in the article.
-
The submitted manuscript must have received explicit approval from all listed co-authors.
-
In the event of any disputes concerning the submitted or published manuscript, the authors bear sole and full responsibility for resolution.
Manuscript Format
-
Manuscripts must conform strictly to the house style specified in the journal's manuscript template.
-
The main body of the article should follow the standard IMRaD structure: Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion.
-
Manuscripts must be arranged in the following sequence: Title; Authorship (author names, affiliations with full addresses, and email addresses); Abstract and Keywords (in English); Abstract and Keywords (in Indonesian); Introduction; Research Methods; Results and Discussion; Conclusion; Acknowledgments (optional); and References.
-
Title: Maximum of 16 words (excluding conjunctions). It should be specific, concise, informative, and accurately representative of the entire study.
-
Abstract: A concise summary outlining the background/research objectives, methods and approaches, key findings, and scientific implications.
-
Keywords: Comprising 5–6 words or short phrases. Keywords must not merely repeat words from the title (appropriate synonyms may be used), avoid overly broad expressions, and be listed in alphabetical order.
-
Introduction: Formulates the research problem, context, and specific objectives, accompanied by a review of current scientific advancements in the field.
-
It should address fundamental questions: What is the core problem? Are there existing solutions? What is the proposed approach? What are the scope and limitations? What aims does the study intend to fulfill?
-
It must demonstrate alignment with the journal’s focus and scope, highlight the clear novelty of the research, and state the necessity of conducting the study.
-
It should be structured using the inverted pyramid model (from broad context to specific research aims).
-
-
Research Methods: Describes the procedures used to address the questions raised in the introduction.
-
Written in continuous narrative prose, not bulleted or numbered lists.
-
Avoid step-by-step instructions typical of laboratory manuals or standard operating procedures.
-
Provide a clear justification for selecting specific methods.
-
Detail how the procedures effectively address the research gaps identified in the introduction.
-
Formulated as a cohesive section without division into sub-headings.
-
Specify study locations, experimental conditions, and timelines whenever they directly influence the discussion of findings.
-
-
Results and Discussion: Presents empirical findings and demonstrates how these results resolve the research problems.
-
Findings may be supplemented with tables or figures.
-
The narrative should interpret the underlying meaning and significance of figures and tables rather than redundantly reciting their raw values.
-
The discussion must emphasize the novelty of the findings, benchmark them against relevant recent literature, clarify boundaries/limitations, and propose future research directions.
-
Formatted using a pyramid structure (moving from specific empirical findings to broader scientific synthesis).
-
-
Conclusion: Synthesizes the primary objectives achieved, the empirical evidence gathered, and the broader implications for agricultural science.
-
Succinctly links the applied methodology to key findings and novelty benchmarks.
-
Outlines the wider scientific or practical implications.
-
Clearly states the limitations of the novelty attained.
-
Formulates actionable recommendations derived from the conclusions.
-
-
Acknowledgments (Optional):
-
Expresses gratitude to individuals or organizations who provided assistance but whose contributions do not warrant co-authorship.
-
Explicitly mentions funding bodies, grants, or sponsor agencies supporting the project and its publication.
-
-
Citations and References:
-
Must contain a minimum of 20 references.
-
At least 80% of all cited references should be primary literature (articles from peer-reviewed journals, conference proceedings, dissertations, theses, monographs, and primary research books).
-
At least 80% of references should ideally be published within the last 10 years.
-
In-text citations should follow standard conventions:
-
Single author: "Author, Year" or "Author (Year)".
-
Two authors: "(Author 1 & Author 2, Year)" or "Author 1 and Author 2 (Year)".
-
More than two authors: "Author 1 et al., Year" or "Author 1 et al. (Year)".
-
Organizational author: "Institution Name, Year" or "Institution Name (Year)".
-
Anonymous authorship should be avoided whenever possible.
-
-
The reference list must be formatted according to the American Psychological Association (APA) style. Authors are strongly encouraged to use reference management software (such as Mendeley, Zotero, or EndNote).
-
-
Tables and Figures:
-
Tables must be formatted with open borders (using horizontal lines sparingly and omitting vertical lines entirely).
-
Figures, graphs, and illustrations must have high visual resolution for optimal clarity and should preferably be original, unedited figures.
-
-
Copyright: Authors retain full copyright over their work, published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).